Introduction

Machining PTFE bellows has always been as much an art as a science. Because of the nature of PTFE as a non-injection mouldable polymer, the only option is to mould a rod or bush and have a tool that creates alternate grooves on the inside and outside, giving the bellow shape needed. Even a small offset in the movement of the tool will result in a bellow where the wall thickness becomes increasingly uneven as the tool makes subsequent cuts.  

The development of PTFE bellows with three distinct layers - PTFE+15% Polyimide at both ends and virgin modified PTFE in the middle—presents a unique challenge in both compression molding and machining. 

This case study explores the intricate process of creating these specialized bellows, detailing the difficulties encountered and the innovative solutions that enabled us to achieve the required specifications with a tolerance of within 1mm.

Challenges in Compression Molding

Molding PTFE with three different layers is an intricate task that demands extreme precision. Unlike homogeneous PTFE components, the layering process necessitates meticulous control to ensure clear demarcation between the materials. The polyimide-filled PTFE at both ends provides enhanced wear resistance and mechanical strength, while the virgin modified PTFE in the middle section offers superior flexibility for the bellow function.

One of the primary difficulties is achieving a distinct joint between each layer. During compression molding, the pressure must be carefully regulated to prevent blending of the materials. If the pressure is too high, the interface between layers can become indistinct, leading to inconsistent performance. Conversely, if the pressure is too low, the adhesion between layers may be insufficient, compromising structural integrity. Similarly, any play in the alignment between the compression moulding dies will result in a slant, meaning a part that is visually uneven and therefore cannot be used.

Another critical challenge is maintaining the correct thickness of each section. The distance between the two PTFE+15% Polyimide layers is strictly defined, requiring exact placement of each material during molding. Achieving this tolerance within 1mm has been particularly difficult, as slight variations in powder distribution, compaction, or sintering can lead to non-conforming parts. However, through continuous optimization of the molding process—including precise measurement of powder distribution and controlled sintering cycles—we have successfully maintained the required tolerances while minimizing rejections.

Complicating this further is the fact that Polyimide is prohibitively expensive. PTFE+15% PI costs nearly 5 times as much as regular modified PTFE. Considering that any bush we mould needs an additional 10-15mm of holding space (which will eventually be disposed of as scrap), making this holding area with PTFE+15% PI is commercially wasteful. Hence, the bellow requires a 4th layer – one with regular PTFE, that is considerably cheaper.

Each layer needs to be of a specific thickness, with only some leeway on the last holding layer. 

Machining Complexities

Once the multi-layered PTFE billet is molded and sintered, machining the final bellow shape presents a new set of challenges. The machining process requires precise positioning of the tool to ensure that both ends (PTFE+15% PI) are threaded while the middle section, made of virgin modified PTFE, forms the bellow’s main functional body.

The difference in material grades complicates the machining process. PTFE+15% Polyimide is harder and more abrasive than virgin modified PTFE, leading to variations in tool wear and cutting behavior. A standard cutting tool would struggle to accommodate these differences, resulting in uneven machining or excessive wear. To overcome this, we developed a specialized high-speed steel (HSS) tool designed specifically for this application. This tool provides superior durability while ensuring smooth transitions between the different material layers.

Positioning and securing the part during machining is another significant challenge. The part must be clamped firmly to prevent any movement that could distort the fine details of the bellow structure. At the same time, excessive clamping force could deform the relatively soft PTFE material. To address this, we developed a customized fixture that securely holds the part without introducing unwanted stress or distortion.

Precision and Efficiency

Each PTFE bellow takes close to an hour to complete, given the precision required in both molding and machining. The time-consuming nature of the process is necessary to ensure high-quality results and compliance with stringent specifications. Despite the extended production time, our refined methodology has allowed us to improve yield rates and maintain consistency across batches.

By optimizing both the compression molding and machining stages, we have successfully produced PTFE bellows that meet all functional and dimensional requirements. The ability to maintain a tolerance within 1mm ensures that the final product performs reliably in its intended application, whether in chemical processing, semiconductor manufacturing, or other demanding industries.

Conclusion

Developing a three-layer PTFE bellow requires expertise in both material science, manual moulding, and precision engineering. The challenges of achieving distinct layer separation during compression molding and accommodating different material behaviors during machining were significant, but through careful process refinement, we have successfully overcome these hurdles. Our ability to manufacture these complex components with high precision reinforces our expertise in high-performance polymer solutions, ensuring that our clients receive products of the highest quality and reliability.

---

Read More

1. Understanding Polyamide: A Versatile Engineering Polymer

2. Crystalline vs. Amorphous Polymers: Structural Overview

3. Exploring Polyetherimide (PEI) - The No Fuss Polymer

Introduction

In the realm of high-performance engineering plastics, PEEK (Polyether Ether Ketone) stands out for its exceptional mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and high thermal stability. However, machining PEEK – or indeed any polymer - to extremely tight tolerances presents significant challenges. The nature of the polymer, combined with external factors such as the use of coolants, the material of the tools, and even the post-machining environment, causes the material to misbehave. As a result, expecting tolerances within 50 microns becomes challenging.

We were approached by a client to manufacture specialized PEEK gears with a required tolerance of 0.01mm (10 microns). Given that polymers typically struggle to maintain such tight tolerances, this was a formidable challenge that required innovation in tooling, machining strategies, and metrology.

The Challenge

The primary challenge was achieving and consistently maintaining the required 0.01mm tolerance. The key hurdles we encountered were:

1. Material Limitations: PEEK, despite its excellent mechanical properties, exhibits thermal expansion and elasticity, making it difficult to achieve stable machining tolerances.

2. Erratic Machining Results: Initial CNC machining trials produced inconsistent results. Some gears met the required tolerances, while others deviated beyond acceptable limits.

3. Metrology Complexity: Standard measurement tools were inadequate for accurately gauging the fine tolerances and runout required for the gears.

4. Tooling and Setup: Conventional machining tools and methods were not providing the repeatability and accuracy required for this project.

The Solution

To overcome these challenges, we took a multi-faceted approach:

1. Developing Special Gauges for Measurement

Measuring tolerances at the micron level required specialized metrology. Standard callipers and micrometers were insufficient due to their limitations in precision and the difficulty of measuring polymer components without deformation. Our VMS equipment – which has a least count of 3 microns – was able to measure the part, but the process was time consuming. We developed custom gauges and used high-precision coordinate measuring machines (CMM) to accurately assess dimensions and runout. This ensured that we could reliably validate the tolerances achieved during machining.

2. Optimizing the CNC Machining Process

To address the erratic results from our initial trials, we experimented with various machining strategies and tools. We identified several key improvements:

• Using Special Tooling: We sourced and developed special cutting tools with optimized geometries to reduce tool deflection and wear. Carbide and diamond-coated tools were used to ensure minimal wear and improved cutting precision.

• Controlling Machining Parameters: We fine-tuned cutting speeds, feed rates, and toolpath strategies to minimize thermal expansion effects. Slow, precise cuts with controlled cooling helped maintain dimensional stability.

• Using Our 5-Axis CNC Machine: A critical breakthrough came from leveraging our advanced 5-axis CNC machine. This allowed for better control over the machining angles, reduced setup errors, and enabled us to achieve highly precise and repeatable results.

3. Process Validation and Iterative Improvement

Once we identified the optimal machining strategy, we performed multiple validation runs to ensure process stability. Each gear was carefully measured using our custom gauges and CMM, allowing us to refine the process further. Over time, we were able to achieve consistent results, meeting the stringent 10-micron tolerance requirement.

The Outcome

Through our systematic approach to overcoming machining and metrology challenges, we successfully manufactured PEEK gears with the required 0.01mm tolerance. This achievement positions us as a leader in precision polymer machining. While the industry norm for polymer machining tolerances is typically around 50 microns, we have demonstrated the ability to achieve and maintain 10-micron tolerances consistently.

Conclusion

This project provided us with deeper insights into the machinability of PEEK and the factors influencing dimensional stability. By investing in specialized tooling, high-precision metrology, and leveraging our 5-axis CNC capabilities, we have set a new benchmark for precision polymer machining. The knowledge gained through this project will not only benefit future PEEK machining applications but also enhance our overall capabilities in high-precision polymer components for demanding industries such as aerospace, medical, and semiconductor manufacturing.

---

Read More

1. Case Study - PVDF Compression Moulding

2. Case Study - PEEK in Coffee Machines

3. Short Neutral Section Development for Railway Applications : Case Study

Although most people are well aware of Nylon as a polymer, few realise that it is a catchall term for a range of grades, each with its own end-properties and applications. While Nylon 6 (PA6) is the most common of all the grades, other grades are increasingly being explored and adopted for a range of industrial, electrical, medical, and consumer applications.

Polyamide (PA), commonly known as Nylon, is a class of synthetic polymers that has gained prominence for its exceptional mechanical and thermal properties. Developed in the 1930s, Nylon was the first commercially successful synthetic thermoplastic, and it continues to be a cornerstone material in various industries. Its versatility stems from its broad range of properties, which can be fine-tuned by altering its molecular structure. Among the numerous types of polyamides, Nylon 6, Nylon 6.6, PA11, and PA12 stand out for their unique characteristics and applications. This article delves into these polyamides, comparing their properties and exploring their industrial applications.

Nylon 6: The Flexible Workhorse

Properties

Nylon 6 is the most commonly used variant. It is relatively inexpensive and can be both cast into sheets and rods, and injection moulded. Further, it easily mixes with a range of additives, that enhance the base properties and make it a well-loved polymer for a host of application. Its molecular structure imparts a high degree of crystallinity, which contributes to its strength and rigidity. Key properties of Nylon 6 include:

• Mechanical Strength: High tensile and impact strength make it suitable for demanding applications.

• Thermal Stability: With a melting point of approximately 220°C, Nylon 6 performs well under elevated temperatures.

• Moisture Absorption: Although it absorbs water, the material maintains its dimensional stability better than many other polymers.

• Chemical Resistance: Resistant to oils, fuels, and solvents, though it can be affected by strong acids and bases.

Applications

Nylon 6 is a preferred material in industries where a balance of strength, flexibility, and cost-efficiency is required. Common applications include:

• Automotive Parts: Engine covers, radiator tanks, and timing chain guides.

• Textiles: Hosiery, activewear, and industrial fabrics.

• Packaging: Films for food preservation and vacuum bags.

• Industrial Machinery: Gears, bearings, and rollers.

Nylon 6.6: The High-Performance Contender

Properties

Nylon 6.6 exhibits higher crystallinity compared to Nylon 6, translating to superior mechanical and thermal properties. The result is that it is more expensive than PA6, and that it tends to be tougher to process. Fewer manufacturers offer this variant, and it can often be substituted with PA6 for cost saving. Key properties of PA66 include:

• Enhanced Strength and Rigidity: Suitable for load-bearing applications.

• Higher Melting Point: Approximately 260°C, making it ideal for high-temperature environments.

• Improved Wear Resistance: Excellent for components subject to friction.

• Moisture Sensitivity: Similar to Nylon 6 but with a slightly higher water uptake.

Applications

Nylon 6.6 is favoured in high-performance applications where durability and thermal resistance are critical. Examples include:

• Aerospace Components: Structural parts, fasteners, and brackets.

• Electrical Insulation: Switchgear, connectors, and housings.

• Industrial Applications: Conveyor belts, pulleys, and seals.

• Consumer Goods: High-quality carpets and upholstery.

PA11: The Bio-Based Alternative

Properties

PA11, or Polyamide 11, is derived from castor oil, making it a renewable and eco-friendly alternative to traditional petroleum-based polyamides. Again, due to its obscure nature, it tends to be extremely expensive and us often used only in areas where its properties have been specifically highlighted and demand PA11 and nothing else. Because of its non-traditional origins, its properties are also distinct:

• Flexibility: High ductility and impact resistance, even at low temperatures.

• Moisture Resistance: Lower water absorption compared to Nylon 6 and Nylon 6.6.

• Thermal Resistance: A melting point of approximately 190°C.

• Chemical Resistance: Excellent resistance to hydrocarbons, acids, and bases.

Applications

PA11 is ideal for industries prioritizing sustainability and performance. Applications include:

• Automotive: Fuel lines, air brake tubing, and electrical cable sheathing.

• Sports Equipment: Ski bindings, tennis racket strings, and protective gear.

• Electronics: Flexible circuits and connectors.

• Medical Devices: Catheters and prosthetic components.

PA12: The Lightweight Performer

Properties

PA12, or Polyamide 12, is the most expensive variant in this list. As a result, your would typically not find too many manufacturers or even dealers willing to stock the grade and any parts made from this usually need to be extruded or injection moulded specifically for the end application in question. PA12 combines strength and flexibility with low density, making it a lightweight option for various applications. Key features include:

• Low Moisture Absorption: Significantly lower than Nylon 6 and Nylon 6.6, ensuring dimensional stability.

• Thermal Performance: A melting point of around 180°C.

• Chemical Resistance: Excellent resistance to oils, fuels, and greases.

• Flexibility and Toughness: Ideal for dynamic applications requiring flexibility.

Applications

PA12’s lightweight nature and resistance to environmental factors make it suitable for:

• Automotive and Aerospace: Fuel hoses, brake lines, and lightweight structural components.

• 3D Printing: Widely used in additive manufacturing for prototypes and end-use parts.

• Medical Applications: Surgical instruments and dental braces.

• Consumer Goods: Eyewear frames and sports equipment.

Comparative Analysis of Nylon 6, Nylon 6.6, PA11, and PA12

Property	Nylon 6	Nylon 6.6	PA11	PA12
Tensile Strength	High	Very High	Moderate	Moderate
Impact Resistance	Moderate	Moderate	High	High
Moisture Absorption	High	High	Low	Very Low
Melting Point (°C)	~220	~260	~190	~180
Chemical Resistance	Good	Very Good	Excellent	Excellent
Renewability	No	No	Yes	No
Density	High	High	Moderate	Low

---

Conclusion

Polyamide, or Nylon, is a remarkably versatile polymer family with a diverse range of properties and applications. Nylon 6 and Nylon 6.6 are celebrated for their strength and thermal stability, making them indispensable in automotive, industrial, and textile sectors. PA11 and PA12, on the other hand, offer unique advantages such as bio-based renewability and lightweight performance, catering to industries focused on sustainability and advanced engineering.

By understanding the nuances of these polyamides, manufacturers and engineers can make informed decisions to optimize performance, cost, and environmental impact in their applications. As innovation continues, the polyamide family’s role in shaping the future of materials science is bound to expand further

---

Read More

1. Crystalline vs. Amorphous Polymers: Structural Overview

2. Exploring Polyetherimide (PEI) - The No Fuss Polymer

3. PTFE in Filtration: The Uses and Benefits of Porous and Microporous PTFE Materials